Actors
- voter: a voter the polls who wants to report a success/failure
- member: somebody who's actively volunteering, including a "more trusted user", Sweeper or SuperTweeter
Voter reports
Reporting on conditions - formatted report
Voter sends a tweet to #votereport giving their location and a comment on one of the attributes they know from the votereport site:
- location - either L: XXXX -or- zipcode XXXXX -or- some variant that can be distinguished
- wait - either wait:(minutes) -or- waittime:(minutes)
-
Use Cases
Voter wants to report on the number of machines at their polling location and how many are working
Voter wants to report a broken machine
Voter wants to report on people being harrassed at the polling location by police, by lawyers, by activists, etc
Voter wants to report on length of the line at their location (e.g. how many people, how long the line is)
Voter wants to report how long it took for them to vote (e.g. tovote:(minutes))
Voter wants to know what are the commands available via #votereport
Voter wants to report an electronic voting machine that took the wrong vote when entered
Via Twitter
Via SMS
Via iPhone
Via phone
Via web (presumably VoteStory '08)
Amplify voter report
Member wants to report on issue but low quantity of datapoints do not provide enough visibility of what is happening at the polling location. Need to ask votereport for amplification/manification of their report (for example - manification of their tweets by some factor for visibility sake)
- Suggestion - play the font size game as done in tag clouds?
SuperTweeter sends in reports for several voters
(particularly important in areas where Twitter usage is low -- which are likely to be the ones most at risk)
Member signs up
Via Web
- Member goes to twittervotereport.com and registers
- If a twitter member:
- Member becomes a follower of @votereport
- votereport then auto-follows the member
- If not a twitter member, offer option to sign up at twitter (?)
- Request cell phone number and carrier (to also have direct connection)
- Have a confirmation sequence (is this important?)
- Location request (is this important?)
- Poll location request (is this important?)
Via twitter
Tracking and Acting
Monitoring at Max Magnitude
Sweeper sends out an alert
- identifies potential pattern
- identifies precinct (may not be unique in urban areas)
- validates data
- gets feedback and confirms
- sends notification
Sweeper detects bad data
- identifies pattern
- gets feedback
- purges data
- alerts somebody to look for broader pattern
Community activists looking out for local problems
what information and visualizations are important, how to convey confidence levels and minimize false alarms, how can they confirm itand to evaluate the severity? how to determine specific precinct if it's not known? what should they do next? who do they contact if they have proble and know what to do/who to contact next?
Election protection group gets alert
what information is there to confirm it, allow the group to evaluate the severity, and know what to do/who to contact next?
Local reporter/blogger is following for a story
National reporter/blogger is following for a story
Comments (0)
You don't have permission to comment on this page.